The Biden administration itself supports a massive military budget, initially requesting $ 753 billion for the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act, a number that has since ballooned, with the Senate set to vote on a $ 778 billion plan. Yet its emissions (and those of other armed forces) are excluded from UN climate negotiations, including the recent COP 26 talks. The Department of Defense is the world’s biggest institutional consumer of fossil fuels and a bigger carbon polluter than 140 countries. ![]() ![]() “Today’s action sends a strong signal that in order to do business with the federal government, companies must protect consumers by beginning to mitigate the impact of climate change on their operations and supply chains,” Shalanda Young, acting director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, said at the time. In October, the Biden administration started the process to amend federal procurement rules to reflect these changes. It would require federal contractors to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions and their “climate-related financial risk,” and to set “science-based reduction targets.” In other words, companies like Lockheed Martin would have to disclose how much carbon pollution its F- 35 aircraft and cluster bombs actually cause. The regulation in question was first proposed in an executive order in May. It turns out the Heritage Foundation also receives significant funding from the weapons industry, which makes the case worth examining - because it reveals how the arms industry pays supposedly respectable institutions to do its policy bidding at the expense of a planet careening toward large-scale climate disaster. ![]() The Heritage Foundation, a prominent conservative think tank, is publicly opposing a new Biden administration regulation that would force the weapons industry to report its greenhouse gas emissions related to federal contracts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |